Get Involved :: Write to the UC President

As president of the University of California, Robert Dynes is responsible for maintaining UC's consistent ranking among the top of national and international institutions of higher education. On the job for less than one year, Dynes faces numerous challenges, e.g., the state budget crises, a new gubernatorial administration, bad press due to a series of security scandals at the national laboratories, and the first-ever competitive bidding process to maintain the multi-billion dollar nuclear weapons development contracts. Dynes is accountable to all the various stakeholders in the UC community: students, alumni, faculty, staff, and community members. Toward resolving these dilemmas, he needs to hear from each and every one of us regarding these important issues. Write him today! Please send us a copy of your letter.

Hard copy:

Robert Dynes, President
The University of California
Office of the Secretary
1111 Franklin St., 12 Fl.
Oakland, CA 94607-5200

Electronic: Nuclear Age Peace Foundation Action Center: http://capwiz.com/wagingpeace/mail/oneclick_compose/?alertid=6270511

Electronic: Dynes' Desk: http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/president/desk.html

 

GET STARTED BY READING OTHERS' LETTERS

BACKGROUND

"100 Letters, 100 Days Campaign"*

From October 2nd , 2003 through January 9th, 2004, the Foundation's UC Nuclear Free campaign and partners welcomed Robert Dynes, the University of California 's newest President, with over 100 letters during his first 100 days in office. An exercise in both coalition-building and grassroots education, this letter-writing campaign helped the Foundation identify and educate new allies as well as communicate diverse opposition to UC's role in nuclear weapons development at a critical juncture.

UC alumni, community members, students and parents of UC students, UC faculty and staff all contributed to the success of the “100 Letters, 100 Days” campaign. Many authors expressed close ties with the university dating back multiple generations. While US citizens penned 64 of the total letters (57 of whom are current California residents), the campaign would not have been successful without input from our allies overseas who wrote the remaining 36 letters. These allies hailed from Argentina , Austria , Amsterdam , Bahrain , Germany , India , and the UK. Authors of the letters referenced various reasons for UC to get out of the nuclear weapons business including: international law, human rights, education and ethics, environmental protection, and sustainability.

Numerous important developments occurred over the course of the letter-writing campaign. Dynes appointed Admiral Robert Foley, former assistant Secretary of Energy for Defense Programs under President Ronald Reagan, as the UC Vice President of Laboratory Management. UC student fees were increased by 30%. A rare Regents meeting at UCLA turned violent. The Academic Senate announced plans to poll faculty later in the year regarding whether or not UC should continue managing the nuclear weapons laboratories. The Regents approved the creation of a national laboratory advisory council and encouraged Dynes to seek corporate partnerships that would improve UC's capacity to bid successfully to continue managing the nuclear weapons laboratories. Also, the Regents of the University of Texas allocated $500,000 to prepare initial plans for a bid when the UC contract comes up for renewal.

Campaign partners, Urs Cipolat (Program Director, Middle Powers Initiative) and Jackie Cabasso (Executive Director, Western States Legal Foundation) hand-delivered the 100 th letter during the public comment session of the UC Regents meeting on January 15, 2004. The Associated Press, Contra Costa Times, San Francisco Chronicle, UCSD Guardian, and the News University at UC Irvine all mentioned the letter-writing campaign in their coverage of the Regents meeting.

“…As a graduate student in the math department I have seen very lucrative fellowships being offered by LLNL to graduate students. This recruitment of UC's finest minds to work in a nuclear weapons facility is particularly appalling….”

Larry Pack, Student

“..It would be bad enough if scientists under UC employ were simply “taking ordered” as passive participants in this insanity (akin to the contractors building the crematoria in Germany 's concentration camps). However, the UC labs aggressively promote and lobby for their new weapons and against any arms controls. They are the NRA of weapons of mass destruction…”

Madge Strong, Alumna

“…Continued work on nuclear weapons has led to proliferation and to the violation and abrogation of international treaties. The reputation of the weapons laboratories, and indeed the University, is being tarnished. Legal actions against the lab have furthered the impression of an enterprise not engaged in careful science but of covering up its responsibilities for environmental health and safety…”

Marc Pilisuk, Professor Emeritus

*An excerpt from Waging Peace, Spring 2004.

Get Involved :: Write to the UC President


a project of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation | www.wagingpeace.org
© Nuclear Age Peace Foundation 2000 - | Powered by EverZen.com